KC Climate Protection Forums » Vision

Let's get radical

(3 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by Akasha
  • Latest reply from TerryWiggins
  • This topic is not a support question

  1. Akasha
    Member

    Barbara Boxer sent out an email asking us to number a list of priorities in relation to the climate crisis. I took the opportunity to submit my opinion.
    This is what I said.
    First, inform citizens with a scientifically verifiable predicted scenario of what life will be like for their children and grandchildren. Point out the immorality of the position of ignorance.
    WAKE UP people so that they realize that it is vital to make sacrifices. Prepare them for RADICAL changes. And then make them. Make it illegal to build buildings that aren't green, illegal to make non-fuel efficient cars. It is a state of emergency NOW!! Engage the human spirit that awakens when disaster strikes, empowering our capacity for innovation and joyful sacrifice. And don't ask uninformed to rate priorities, figure out which action is the most effective and start there!
    *********************************************

    It seems to me that we aren't taking the science seriously, and you know what happens when we do that. Things get worse. I've lived 30 years in Sweden where the priorities are much saner and I know, legislating to protect the environment is possible. One can live a very satisfying life and still consume only half of what is consumed in the US. EDUCATE people! Legislate with the future in mind.
    In Sweden we pay a deposit for all PLASTIC bottles, aluminum cans and most glass pop and beer bottles. In the grocery store one must purchase "plastic or paper". That affects patterns of consumption. It affects the amount of waste produced. Auto fuel is expensive, auto taxes are high, public transportation is cheap and efficient. In our family of 8 adults, 1 owns a car.
    If gas prices went up in the US, wouldn't more people use public transportation? It seems to me there are innumerable things that could be done. If we wanted to. Without awareness of the facts, no one will do anything. I believe the change will come from the grassroots, once they are informed.

    Posted: 2007-01-30 20:53:53 #
  2. MartyKraft

    Akasha

    I can understand your frustration. You have seen what can be done and know that your life is not restricted by environmental laws that protect natural systems. We have the communication tools with TV, radio and newspapers to educate people in a very short amount of time if the media owners would choose to work for the public good in this way. I think the Star is going to have an article and start a blog on climate change this Friday 2/2. Maybe the other media will follow suit.

    Posted: 2007-01-31 14:46:02 #
  3. TerryWiggins
    Member

    Here's another possibility, that KC could emulate. A friend just sent it to me from Yahoo news:

    California may ban conventional lightbulbs by 2012

    By Bernie Woodall Tue Jan 30, 9:05 PM ET

    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A California lawmaker wants to make his state the first to ban incandescent lightbulbs as part of California's groundbreaking initiatives to reduce energy use and greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

    The "How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act" would ban incandescent lightbulbs by 2012 in favor of energy-saving compact fluorescent lightbulbs. . .

    A number of years ago, maybe as long ago as the 1970's or 1980's, I read psychological studies that indicated that people changed their attitudes after changing their behavior. As I recall, these studies were done in regard to Affirmative Action laws, and found that people who were initially against the laws changed their attitudes after working under them. So, initial opposition doesn't mean that people might not learn that they can do better, even though sometimes the better behavior has to forced onto some of them.

    Posted: 2007-01-31 15:16:48 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.