<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>KC Climate Protection Forums Topic: Live Closer to Home</title>
<link>http://www.allspecies.org/forum/</link>
<description>KC Climate Protection Forums Topic: Live Closer to Home</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>ronmclinden on "Live Closer to Home"</title>
<link>http://www.allspecies.org/forum/topic/52#post-85</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ronmclinden</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">85@http://www.allspecies.org/forum/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There's a lot of GHG emissions associated with how far we travel -- also what modes we choose and how fast we go, of course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There's also a lot of transportation-related GHG emissions wrapped up in everything that we purchase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take a look at this article, &quot;Living Closer to Home,&quot; on the Sierra Club website:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://missouri.sierraclub.org/thb/conservation/consumption/live-closer-to-home.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://missouri.sierraclub.org/thb/conservation/consumption/live-closer-to-home.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A public awareness campaign about the GHG emissions and other costs of going farther than we have to go -- and buying products from unnecessarily far-off places -- would have positive benefits.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The purchasing part could be presented as &quot;buy local&quot; and most people would see it as an economic development campaign instead of climate protection -- and that's not bad.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
